F · worse than 99% of San Francisco intersections

108 collisions in 5 years, 1 fatal, 287 street-condition 311 reports in 3 years. District 5

SUPPORTED

Get the letter
The corner, three ways

Eddy and Leavenworth

AUDITED
San Francisco, District 5
Street View plus Gemini
Eddy and Leavenworth today, photographed by Google Street View AI visualization of a proposed fix at Eddy and Leavenworth. Not a photograph.

TodayThe corner as Street View last photographed it. Imagery: Google.

Official record
Case fileevery date read from a stored record, none invented
  1. DataSFScored from the city's own recordsdate not recorded
  2. Google MapsPhotographedchecking the stored frame
  3. ExaPress readchecking stored coverage
  4. ApifyResidents heardchecking stored scrapes
  5. GeminiVisual auditchecking the stored audit
  6. GeminiFix drawnchecking the stored render
  7. The gateLetter verifiedchecking the stored letter
  8. YouSent: that part is yoursthe letter is drafted, never sent by us

Press coverage

found live, cited Press via Exa

Resident voices

scraped
Injury collisions, last 5 years
within 150m
Street-condition 311 reports, 3 years
within 150m
Supervisor district

The ask

DRAFT ONLY
Proposed fix
Continental crosswalks, corner daylighting, and a leading pedestrian interval
$250,000 to $350,000, order of magnitude
Funding route
Caltrans Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
NOT SENT TO ANY OFFICIAL
Dear Supervisor Mahmood, I am writing regarding safety issues at Eddy and Leavenworth in District 5. City records show 108 injury collisions, including one fatal, within 150 meters over the last five years. This figure covers a 150-meter radius, while the Danger Index grade is computed over a tighter 80-meter core, so these figures are measured over different areas and should not be expected to reconcile. This intersection shows more reported harm than 99 percent of San Francisco intersections, earning Grade F on the Danger Index. No exposure normalization: the index ranks reported harm, not risk per crossing. Additionally, 288 street-condition 311 reports (street defects, sidewalk, curb, signs, streetlights, blocked sidewalks) were filed for this location in the last three years. A recent search found no press coverage for this corner, though press coverage of safety problems here dates back at least nine years, to 2017, the earliest coverage we can find. An automated visual audit flagged a vehicle turning conflict zone, corroborated by city records showing six pedestrian crossing collisions in five years. City records also show nine 311 reports in 12 months and six pedestrian crossing collisions in five years relating to faded or sub-standard crosswalk markings. City records indicate three 311 reports in 12 months concerning inadequate street lighting, and five 311 reports in 12 months relating to curb or sidewalk in poor condition. The visual audit did not find these in the photograph. I urge you to advocate for funding Continental crosswalks, corner daylighting, and a leading pedestrian interval. An estimated $250,000 to $350,000, order of magnitude, could be secured through the Caltrans Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). Sincerely, A resident of District 5
draftedby Gemini

Every figure in this letter is checked against the source records before it is shown. A draft that states something the records do not support is rejected and rewritten.

Powered by

Google GeminiGeminiAudits the real Street View frame for hazards, renders the fix, writes the letter
ExaExaFinds current press coverage of this intersection, cited
ApifyApifyScrapes what residents say on Reddit and Google Maps
Google MapsGoogle MapsStreet View frames, the corner thumbnail, and the city map
CloudflareCloudflareWorkers serve the page, KV holds corners, imagery and grades
DataSFDataSFCollisions and 311, queried by radius around the corner

Every claim about a dangerous corner, graded and traced to its source, ending in a picture of the fix and a letter to the Supervisor.