F · worse than 95% of San Francisco intersections

19 collisions in 5 years, 66 street-condition 311 reports in 3 years. District 5

SUPPORTED

Get the letter
The corner, three ways

Fulton and Masonic

AUDITED
San Francisco, District 5
Street View plus Gemini
Fulton and Masonic today, photographed by Google Street View AI visualization of a proposed fix at Fulton and Masonic. Not a photograph.

TodayThe corner as Street View last photographed it. Imagery: Google.

Official record
Case fileevery date read from a stored record, none invented
  1. DataSFScored from the city's own recordsdate not recorded
  2. Google MapsPhotographedchecking the stored frame
  3. ExaPress readchecking stored coverage
  4. ApifyResidents heardchecking stored scrapes
  5. GeminiVisual auditchecking the stored audit
  6. GeminiFix drawnchecking the stored render
  7. The gateLetter verifiedchecking the stored letter
  8. YouSent: that part is yoursthe letter is drafted, never sent by us

Press coverage

found live, cited Press via Exa

Resident voices

scraped
Injury collisions, last 5 years
within 150m
Street-condition 311 reports, 3 years
within 150m
Supervisor district

The ask

DRAFT ONLY
Proposed fix
Continental crosswalks, corner daylighting, and a leading pedestrian interval
$250,000 to $350,000, order of magnitude
Funding route
Caltrans Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
NOT SENT TO ANY OFFICIAL
Dear Supervisor Mahmood, I am writing to respectfully bring to your attention urgent safety concerns regarding the intersection of Fulton and Masonic in District 5. The city has recorded 19 injury collisions within 150 meters of this intersection in the last five years. This figure covers a 150-meter radius; the Danger Index grade is computed over a tighter 80-meter core, so these figures are measured over different areas and do not reconcile. City records also show 66 street-condition 311 reports at this location in the last three years, including street defects, sidewalks, signs, streetlights, and blocked sidewalks. This intersection shows more reported harm than 95 percent of San Francisco intersections, receiving a grade F on the Danger Index. No exposure normalization: the index ranks reported harm, not risk per crossing. While no press coverage was found recently, documented press coverage of safety problems at this intersection goes back at least 12 years, to 2014, the earliest coverage we can find. An automated visual audit flagged a vehicle turning conflict zone in the Street View photograph, and city records corroborate this with 1 pedestrian crossing collision in 5 years. City records show 311 reports: 4 in 12 months, and 1 pedestrian crossing collision in 5 years relating to faded crosswalks, though the visual audit did not find this in the photograph. I urge you to fund Continental crosswalks, corner daylighting, and a leading pedestrian interval. The estimated $250,000 to $350,000 cost could be pursued via the Caltrans Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). Thank you for your time and consideration of this critical safety matter. Sincerely, A resident of District 5
draftedby Gemini

Every figure in this letter is checked against the source records before it is shown. A draft that states something the records do not support is rejected and rewritten.

Powered by

Google GeminiGeminiAudits the real Street View frame for hazards, renders the fix, writes the letter
ExaExaFinds current press coverage of this intersection, cited
ApifyApifyScrapes what residents say on Reddit and Google Maps
Google MapsGoogle MapsStreet View frames, the corner thumbnail, and the city map
CloudflareCloudflareWorkers serve the page, KV holds corners, imagery and grades
DataSFDataSFCollisions and 311, queried by radius around the corner

Every claim about a dangerous corner, graded and traced to its source, ending in a picture of the fix and a letter to the Supervisor.