F · worse than 99% of San Francisco intersections
70 collisions in 5 years, 200 street-condition 311 reports in 3 years
REPORTED ONLY
Larch & Van NessENRICHED
Get the letter
Replay of the actual run from this corner
Timings compressed for display. Nothing is re-run: this replays what was recorded.
The corner, three ways
Street View plus Gemini
Larch and Van Ness
ENRICHED
TodayThe corner as Street View last photographed it. Imagery: Google.
Projected outcome
Projections from published national research (FHWA CMF Clearinghouse). Not a promise about this corner.
Official record
0/100
Location
Google MapsLarch and Van Ness. Map data: Google.
Case fileevery date read from a stored record, none invented
- DataSFScored from the city's own recordsdate not recorded
- Google MapsPhotographedchecking the stored frame
- ExaPress readchecking stored coverage
- ApifyResidents heardchecking stored scrapes
- GeminiVisual auditchecking the stored audit
- GeminiFix drawnchecking the stored render
- The gateLetter verifiedchecking the stored letter
- YouSent: that part is yoursthe letter is drafted, never sent by us
Press coverage
found live, citedCoverage by year
Resident voices
scrapedInjury collisions, last 5 years
within 150m
within 150m
Street-condition 311 reports, 3 years
within 150m
within 150m
Supervisor district
The ask
DRAFT ONLYProposed fix
Continental crosswalks, corner daylighting, and a leading pedestrian interval
$250,000 to $350,000, order of magnitude
Funding route
Caltrans Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
NOT SENT TO ANY OFFICIAL
Dear Supervisor Mahmood,
I am writing to you as a concerned resident of District 5 regarding the urgent safety issues at the intersection of Larch and Van Ness.
City records show 71 injury collisions within 150 meters of this intersection in the last five years. This figure covers a 150 meter radius, while the Danger Index grade is computed over a tighter 80 meter core, so the two figures are measured over different areas and a reader should not expect them to reconcile. Furthermore, 198 street-condition 311 reports, covering street defects, sidewalk and curb, signs, streetlights, and blocked sidewalks, have been filed at this location in the last three years.
The intersection shows more reported harm than 99 percent of San Francisco intersections, earning a grade F on the Danger Index. No exposure normalization: the index ranks reported harm, not risk per crossing. While no recent press coverage was found for this specific corner, documented coverage of safety problems at this intersection goes back at least 10 years, to 2016, representing the earliest coverage we can find. No visual audit findings are available for this corner.
To address these documented safety concerns, I respectfully request your support in funding critical improvements: Continental crosswalks, corner daylighting, and a leading pedestrian interval. An estimated $250,000 to $350,000, order of magnitude, would be needed, and I urge you to pursue funding through the Caltrans Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP).
Thank you for your attention to this vital matter.
Sincerely,
A resident of District 5
draftedby Gemini
Every figure in this letter is checked against the source records before it is shown. A draft that states something the records do not support is rejected and rewritten.
This works in San Francisco
official sourceOutcomes as reported by SFMTA's own evaluations.