F · worse than 99% of San Francisco intersections

68 collisions in 5 years, 1 fatal, 351 street-condition 311 reports in 3 years

REPORTED ONLY

Get the letter
The corner, three ways

Larkin and Myrtle

ENRICHED
San Francisco, district unresolved
Street View plus Gemini
Larkin and Myrtle today, photographed by Google Street View AI visualization of a proposed fix at Larkin and Myrtle. Not a photograph.

TodayThe corner as Street View last photographed it. Imagery: Google.

Official record
Case fileevery date read from a stored record, none invented
  1. DataSFScored from the city's own recordsdate not recorded
  2. Google MapsPhotographedchecking the stored frame
  3. ExaPress readchecking stored coverage
  4. ApifyResidents heardchecking stored scrapes
  5. GeminiVisual auditchecking the stored audit
  6. GeminiFix drawnchecking the stored render
  7. The gateLetter verifiedchecking the stored letter
  8. YouSent: that part is yoursthe letter is drafted, never sent by us

Press coverage

found live, cited Press via Exa

Resident voices

scraped
Injury collisions, last 5 years
within 150m
Street-condition 311 reports, 3 years
within 150m
Supervisor district

The ask

DRAFT ONLY
Proposed fix
Continental crosswalks, corner daylighting, and a leading pedestrian interval
$250,000 to $350,000, order of magnitude
Funding route
Caltrans Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
NOT SENT TO ANY OFFICIAL
Dear Supervisor Mahmood, I am writing to express my serious concern regarding the intersection of Larkin and Myrtle. City records document 68 injury collisions within 150 meters of this intersection in the last five years, including one fatality; this 150-meter radius differs from the 80-meter core used for the Danger Index, so the figures are not directly comparable. This intersection shows more reported harm than 99 percent of San Francisco intersections, earning a grade F on the Danger Index. (No exposure normalization: the index ranks reported harm, not risk per crossing.) Furthermore, 350 street-condition 311 reports, covering street defects, sidewalks, curbs, signs, streetlights, and blocked sidewalks, have been filed for this location in the last three years. While no press coverage was found in a recent search, press coverage of safety problems at this intersection goes back at least 9 years, to 2017, representing the earliest coverage we can find. No visual audit findings are available for this corner. I urge you to fund critical safety improvements: Continental crosswalks, corner daylighting, and a leading pedestrian interval. An estimated $250,000 to $350,000, order of magnitude, could be secured through the Caltrans Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, A resident of District 5
draftedby Gemini

Every figure in this letter is checked against the source records before it is shown. A draft that states something the records do not support is rejected and rewritten.

Powered by

Google GeminiGeminiAudits the real Street View frame for hazards, renders the fix, writes the letter
ExaExaFinds current press coverage of this intersection, cited
ApifyApifyScrapes what residents say on Reddit and Google Maps
Google MapsGoogle MapsStreet View frames, the corner thumbnail, and the city map
CloudflareCloudflareWorkers serve the page, KV holds corners, imagery and grades
DataSFDataSFCollisions and 311, queried by radius around the corner

Every claim about a dangerous corner, graded and traced to its source, ending in a picture of the fix and a letter to the Supervisor.