F · worse than 99% of San Francisco intersections

86 collisions in 5 years, 288 street-condition 311 reports in 3 years. District 8

SUPPORTED

Get the letter
The corner, three ways

Market and Octavia

AUDITED
San Francisco, District 8
Street View plus Gemini
Market and Octavia today, photographed by Google Street View AI visualization of a proposed fix at Market and Octavia. Not a photograph.

TodayThe corner as Street View last photographed it. Imagery: Google.

Official record
Case fileevery date read from a stored record, none invented
  1. DataSFScored from the city's own recordsdate not recorded
  2. Google MapsPhotographedchecking the stored frame
  3. ExaPress readchecking stored coverage
  4. ApifyResidents heardchecking stored scrapes
  5. GeminiVisual auditchecking the stored audit
  6. GeminiFix drawnchecking the stored render
  7. The gateLetter verifiedchecking the stored letter
  8. YouSent: that part is yoursthe letter is drafted, never sent by us

Press coverage

found live, cited Press via Exa

Resident voices

scraped
Injury collisions, last 5 years
within 150m
Street-condition 311 reports, 3 years
within 150m
Supervisor district

The ask

DRAFT ONLY
Proposed fix
Continental crosswalks, corner daylighting, and a leading pedestrian interval
$250,000 to $350,000, order of magnitude
Funding route
Caltrans Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
NOT SENT TO ANY OFFICIAL
Dear Supervisor Mandelman, I am writing to you as a concerned District 8 resident regarding the persistent safety issues at the intersection of Market and Octavia. This intersection shows more reported harm than 99 percent of San Francisco intersections, earning an F grade on the Danger Index. No exposure normalization: the index ranks reported harm, not risk per crossing. City records document 86 injury collisions within 150 meters of this intersection in the last five years. This figure covers a 150-meter radius, while the Danger Index grade is computed over a tighter 80-meter core, so the two figures are measured over different areas. Street-condition 311 reports total 289 over the last three years, covering street defects, sidewalks, curbs, signs, streetlights, and blocked sidewalks. While no press coverage was found in a recent search, press coverage of safety problems at this intersection goes back at least 12 years, to 2014. An automated visual audit flagged a vehicle turning conflict zone, which city records corroborate with 2 pedestrian crossing collisions in 5 years. City records also show 311 reports: 17 in 12 months, and 2 pedestrian crossing collisions in 5 years, relating to faded or sub-standard crosswalk markings, though the visual audit did not find this. Records also show 311 reports: 24 in 12 months for inadequate street lighting, and 311 reports: 15 in 12 months for poor curb or sidewalk condition, neither of which the visual audit found. I urge you to fund safety improvements: Continental crosswalks, corner daylighting, and a leading pedestrian interval. An estimated $250,000 to $350,000 could be secured through the Caltrans Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). Thank you for your attention to this critical matter. Sincerely, A resident of District 8
draftedby Gemini

Every figure in this letter is checked against the source records before it is shown. A draft that states something the records do not support is rejected and rewritten.

Powered by

Google GeminiGeminiAudits the real Street View frame for hazards, renders the fix, writes the letter
ExaExaFinds current press coverage of this intersection, cited
ApifyApifyScrapes what residents say on Reddit and Google Maps
Google MapsGoogle MapsStreet View frames, the corner thumbnail, and the city map
CloudflareCloudflareWorkers serve the page, KV holds corners, imagery and grades
DataSFDataSFCollisions and 311, queried by radius around the corner

Every claim about a dangerous corner, graded and traced to its source, ending in a picture of the fix and a letter to the Supervisor.