F · worse than 99% of San Francisco intersections

70 collisions in 5 years, 292 street-condition 311 reports in 3 years

PARTIAL

Get the letter
The corner, three ways

Polk and Post

AUDITED
San Francisco, district unresolved
Street View plus Gemini
Polk and Post today, photographed by Google Street View AI visualization of a proposed fix at Polk and Post. Not a photograph.

TodayThe corner as Street View last photographed it. Imagery: Google.

Official record
Case fileevery date read from a stored record, none invented
  1. DataSFScored from the city's own recordsdate not recorded
  2. Google MapsPhotographedchecking the stored frame
  3. ExaPress readchecking stored coverage
  4. ApifyResidents heardchecking stored scrapes
  5. GeminiVisual auditchecking the stored audit
  6. GeminiFix drawnchecking the stored render
  7. The gateLetter verifiedchecking the stored letter
  8. YouSent: that part is yoursthe letter is drafted, never sent by us

Press coverage

found live, cited Press via Exa

Resident voices

scraped
Injury collisions, last 5 years
within 150m
Street-condition 311 reports, 3 years
within 150m
Supervisor district

The ask

DRAFT ONLY
Proposed fix
Continental crosswalks, corner daylighting, and a leading pedestrian interval
$250,000 to $350,000, order of magnitude
Funding route
Caltrans Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
NOT SENT TO ANY OFFICIAL
Supervisor Danny Sauter District 3 San Francisco, CA Dear Supervisor Sauter, I am writing to you regarding the urgent safety concerns at the intersection of Polk and Post Streets. This location shows more reported harm than 99 percent of San Francisco intersections, earning a grade F on the Danger Index. (No exposure normalization: the index ranks reported harm, not risk per crossing.) City records document 70 injury collisions within 150 meters of this intersection in the last five years. For context, the Danger Index grade is computed over a tighter 80-meter core, so these figures are measured over different areas. Furthermore, there have been 292 street-condition 311 reports concerning street defects, sidewalks, curbs, signs, streetlights, and blocked sidewalks at this location in the last three years. While recent searches found no press coverage for this corner, reports of safety problems here go back at least 12 years, to 2014, representing the earliest coverage we can find. An automated visual audit flagged a vehicle turning conflict zone in the Street View photograph, which city records corroborate with 3 pedestrian crossing collisions in 5 years. City records also show 10 street-condition 311 reports in 12 months and 3 pedestrian crossing collisions in 5 years related to faded or sub-standard crosswalk markings, though the visual audit did not find this in the photograph. Similarly, city records show 5 street-condition 311 reports in 12 months regarding poor curb or sidewalk condition, which the visual audit did not observe. I urge you to advocate for funding Continental crosswalks, corner daylighting, and a leading pedestrian interval at this intersection. An estimated $250,000 to $350,000, order of magnitude, could be secured through the Caltrans Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). Thank you for your attention to this critical matter. Sincerely, A resident of District 3
draftedby Gemini

Every figure in this letter is checked against the source records before it is shown. A draft that states something the records do not support is rejected and rewritten.

Powered by

Google GeminiGeminiAudits the real Street View frame for hazards, renders the fix, writes the letter
ExaExaFinds current press coverage of this intersection, cited
ApifyApifyScrapes what residents say on Reddit and Google Maps
Google MapsGoogle MapsStreet View frames, the corner thumbnail, and the city map
CloudflareCloudflareWorkers serve the page, KV holds corners, imagery and grades
DataSFDataSFCollisions and 311, queried by radius around the corner

Every claim about a dangerous corner, graded and traced to its source, ending in a picture of the fix and a letter to the Supervisor.